The absence of civil society representation has generated significant criticism at the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) 50th Anniversary Ministerial, which commenced on February 13, 2024. The Climate Action Network (CAN) has expressed strong disapproval of this exclusion of voices from environmental, climate, and broader civil society movements.
Despite the acknowledged importance of widespread public support for a just energy transition, the IEA has opted not to include representatives from these sectors in the various panels scheduled throughout the event. This omission has sparked outcry during the three-day event, intended to address crucial issues related to energy transition, climate change, and environmental concerns.
CAN, a coalition representing over 1,900 organizations from 130 countries, plays a pivotal role in advocating for climate action and promoting the global clean energy transition. In a letter addressed to the IEA and published on its website for public awareness, CAN has decried the absence of civil society representation.
This absence, according to CAN, goes against the principles of international environmental governance, where the participation of diverse voices is deemed essential. It is noteworthy that more than two-thirds of IEA members are obligated by legally binding commitments to facilitate public participation in forums addressing environmental matters.
Tasneem Essop, Executive Director of Climate Action Network International, expressed astonishment at the exclusion, emphasizing that a just energy transition aligned with the Paris Agreement and a 1.5°C pathway cannot materialize unless the voices, concerns, and solutions of people are taken into account. Essop further stressed the imperative for the IEA to recognize and act upon the critical role that civil society plays in addressing the climate crisis.
Essop criticized the IEA 50th Anniversary agenda for only incorporating voices from governments, businesses, and technical experts, thereby creating what she described as an “echo chamber” that excludes perspectives from environmental civil society, social movements, and trade unions globally. She called upon the IEA not only to recognize the vital role of civil society but also to undertake concrete actions by providing spaces for their voices to be heard.
As the global community grapples with the urgency of addressing climate change, the exclusion of civil society representatives from such a significant ministerial event raises questions about the inclusivity and effectiveness of international efforts to combat the climate crisis. The appeal from CAN for greater representation and recognition of civil society’s role serves as a poignant reminder that a truly just energy transition necessitates the involvement of diverse voices and perspectives to ensure that no one is marginalized
